Fact Vs. Invective
NEW CAUCUS
Countering Disinformation

HOME

WHO WE ARE

BYLAWS

MEMBERSHIP

2007 CHAPTER ELECTIONS

 

2006 Election

ELECTION RESULTS

ELECTION SLATE

ELECTRONIC
LITERATURE

SUBSCRIBE TO
E-LITERATURE

PRINT
LITERATURE

NOMINATING
CONVENTION

FACT VS
INVECTIVE

TESTIMONIALS -
"I Am Voting New Caucus Because..."

 WELFARE FUND:
Let's Get The Record Straight!

 

 

 

 

 

This is a archived page from the Spring, 2006 election

From time to time, the New Caucus leadership of the PSC has been been the target of pejorative and gratuitous attacks that at best play with the truth and at worst stoop to slander and childish name-calling.  The Patriot Returns fits the latter category.  Below are two recent responses to the Patriot Returns by Steve London, a founding member of the New Caucus and First Vice President of the PSC.

 

January 6, 2006

Dear Colleagues, 

Many of you receive unsolicited email messages from “The Patriot Returns.” 

The latest patriot-spam, Vol. 28, No 1, begins by getting the year wrong.  Sharad Karkhanis reports the new year as 2005.  Using his own distorted logic, one might suppose Karkhanis is trying to trick us into thinking the year has not changed.  Of course, drawing such a conclusion would be ridiculous, just as his conclusions about the PSC leadership and  “basic facts” concerning PSC membership are ridiculous. 

After I corrected the misinformation about PSC membership numbers circulated by Karkhanis in one of his patriot-spam missives (Vol 27, # 2), Karkhanis has again resorted to his usual infantile and ridiculing style of argumentation in his latest communication.  In the process, he demonstrates yet again that he doesn’t understand what he is talking about. 

In my December 20, 2005 response to Karkhanis’ questioning of PSC leadership’s use of membership numbers, I pointed out that, in 2005, those the PSC represented (faculty, professional staff and retirees) fluctuated from a near low of 17,897 (before the start of the fall semester) to a near high of 22,090 (in December).  CUNY’s Office of Faculty and Staff Relations puts the number of active instructional staff at 21,611 in Fall 2004 (Report available on the CUNY website).  Approximately 700 of these are excluded from the PSC bargaining unit.  Given that membership numbers are always a snapshot of a changing field and given the above range, I said 20,000 seemed like a “fair characterization” of those represented by the PSC.  I stand by that conclusion. 

Karkhanis tries to save face, in usual fashion, by attempting to discredit me.  First, he is dishonest when he deliberately misquoted me, claiming I said the “‘accurate’ total...is 22,090.”  In fact, I said the 22,090 number was a “snapshot.”  Having misquoted me, Karkhanis then tries to cast doubt on the 22,090 number by saying I was “citing a non-public database.”  The database I cited was the PSC membership database that is derived from New York City and New York State payroll tapes and processed for the PSC by New York State United Teachers. Payroll data is public information and Karkhanis is free to do a Freedom of Information Request of the City and State if he wants to check to see if NYSUT has accurately processed and reported PSC bargaining unit membership. 

Next, Karkhanis displays his profound ignorance of CUNY’s workforce when he asks, “Now, for anyone who believes that the PSC membership has increased by a total of 4,193(!) in the last few months, we have a bridge in Brooklyn we’d like to sell you.” (emphasis in the original)  There are now approximately 7,500 teaching adjuncts who are hired on a semester basis, an additional 1,000 to 1,500 Continuing Education Teachers hired as hourly employees on a part-time basis, and approximately 1,100 non-teaching adjuncts hired part-time.  In fact, anyone who has a rudimentary understanding of how the University operates would expect to find large increases in teaching and non-teaching adjuncts from pre- to mid-semester. 

Apparently, Karkhanis is prepared to say anything in his long-time attempt to discredit PSC leadership.  All he does, though, is to show himself to be unprofessional and unconcerned about the real issues confronting CUNY and the PSC. 

Karkhanis claims to speak knowledgeably about the University as he disagrees with the PSC leadership.  He is free to disagree with PSC leadership, but he does no service to the union or to the university community by disseminating misinformation, engaging in dishonest characterizations, broadcasting baseless rumors, and engaging in ad hominem attacks. 

Please keep this in mind if you choose to open and read the next patriot-spam. 

Steve London
PSC First Vice President

 

 

December 20, 2005

Dear Colleagues, 

In the latest "Patriot Returns," Sharad Karkhanis gets it wrong again.  In his attempt at "gotcha" journalism, Karkhanis only proves he doesn't understand what he is talking about.  He claims there is a discrepancy between the number of faculty, professional staff, and retirees the PSC reported to the US Labor Department (17,897), as required by law, and the number the PSC claims to represent in ads run during the contract campaign (20,000).

 
If Karkhanis ever cared about the truth, he could have asked why there are differences in these numbers.  The answer is simple.  Membership numbers fluctuate all the time.  Any one day is a snapshot of a constantly changing field.  The numbers reported to the US Labor Department are for the end of the union's fiscal year, August 31st.  Since this is at the end of the summer and before fall semester hiring is recorded, instructional staff numbers are at a low point.  The City University Personnel System (CUPS) for April 15, 2005 reported the number of instructional staff represented by the PSC at 20,241 (retirees are not reported in CUPS).  A  December 7, 2005 snapshot from the PSC membership department puts total faculty, professional staff, and retirees represented at 22,090.  Thus, 20,000 is a fair characterization of those the PSC represents.
 
Of course, Karkhanis is not interested in the truth.  He blows smoke where there is no fire.  The best way to avoid his noxious fumes is to hit the delete key as soon as patriot-spam appears in your email.
 
Steve London
PSC First Vice President